Template talk:Version

Versioning Articles - Best Practices
I am of the opinion that we should prefer to use exact build numbers when editing an article that uses a template which includes a version value. This would force us to do a "light" audit of the entire catalogue with each major update. Given how infrequent the major updates are and the minor level of work that would be involved, I don't see such an audit being too much of an inconvenience particularly given that the end result is an up-to-date and useful wiki overall.

With how often Experimental builds are pushed to the public however, I think it would be appropriate to use the "experimental" value in the version field when dealing with an article that pertains specifically to content that is in Experimental but not on the Stable branch. This would save us the work of editing every related article 4 or 5 times a week. This can then be switched to an exact value when the patch is pushed to the Stable branch. --Tatanko (talk) 18:17, 20 December 2016 (UTC)